Perpetual futures vs. standard futures: how perps and funding work
Back

Perpetual futures vs. standard futures: how perps and funding work

October 28, 2026
Perpetual futures vs. standard futures: how perps and funding work

Perpetual futures have surged in popularity this year because of what separates them from the standard futures contracts used on traditional exchanges. The difference comes down to one design choice: the expiry date is removed, and a payment between traders replaces it.

‍

What is a standard futures contract?

A standard future is a futures contract with a set expiration and settlement date. It is an agreement to buy or sell an asset at a set price at a later date, and its value derives from the underlying asset. Standard futures typically settle weekly, monthly, or quarterly, in cash or through physical delivery of the asset, like oil barrels or pork bellies, when the contract expires.

‍

How does this differ from a perpetual future?

In 1992, Nobel Prize-winning economist Robert Shiller asked a fundamental question: If 99% of people in the futures market are just speculating and don't actually want physical delivery of pork bellies or oil barrels, why force contracts to expire? Shiller theorized perpetual futures (or "perps"); derivative contracts that never expire. While Robert Shiller invented the math using real-world asset concepts, perps found their first success when cryptocurrency markets gained widespread adoption in the mid-2010s..

The main benefit of perps is continuity. When a standard future expires, an investor who wants ongoing exposure must close and reopen their contracts, a process called rolling that incurs fees and slippage - the gap between the expected and actual trade price. Since a perp never expires, it avoids the roll. This is often preferred by investors who wish to hold their positions indefinitely. 

A further benefit is that perps also trade 24/7, which can aid price discovery outside of typical market hours, including on weekends and holidays, when traditional markets are closed. 

A standard future settles once, at expiry, in cash or through physical delivery of the underlying asset. Because a perp has no expiry, it instead settles continuously through the funding rate (explained below).

‍

How does the funding rate of a perpetual future keep its price in line with the spot?

As expiry approaches for a standard future, thecontract price converges on the spot price due to the need for the future to be settled for cash or through physical delivery of the underlying asset.

Since a perp never settles, it needs a substitute - the funding rate. The funding rate is a payment between investors holding long and short positions that is typically made every eight hours, which is the industry standard on most major digital-asset derivatives exchanges.

The direction of the funding rate payment depends on the gap. When the perp trades above spot, investors holding long positions (bets that the price will rise) will pay those holding short positions (bets that the price will fall). The purpose of this is to incentivise investors to take the other side of a trade when there is excess demand on one side. 

The size of the payment reflects the size of the gap between the perp and spot prices. Think of the funding rate as a rubber band - the further the perp price stretches away from spot, the harder the band pulls it back.

‍

Table of contents

Share

This report has been prepared and issued by 21Shares AG for publication globally. All information used in the publication of this report has been compiled from publicly available sources that are believed to be reliable, however we do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this report. Crypto asset trading involves a high degree of risk. The crypto asset market is new to many and unproven and may have the potential to not grow as expected.

Currently, there is relatively small use of crypto assets in the retail and commercial marketplace in comparison to relatively large use by speculators, thus contributing to price volatility that could adversely affect an investment in crypto assets. In order to participate in the trading of crypto assets, you should be capable of evaluating the merits and risks of the investment and be able to bear the economic risk of losing your entire investment.

Nothing in this publication does or should be considered as an offer by 21Shares AG and/or its affiliates to sell or solicitation by 21Shares AG or its parent of any offer to buy bitcoin or other crypto assets or derivatives. This report is provided for information and research purposes only and should not be construed or presented as an offer or solicitation for any investment. The information provided does not constitute a prospectus or any offering and does not contain or constitute an offer to sell or solicit an offer to invest in any jurisdiction.

Readers are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, and that actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. The information contained herein may not be considered as economic, legal, tax, or other advice and users are cautioned against basing investment decisions or other decisions solely on the content hereof.

‍

Neueste Einblicke

Bleiben Sie informiert mit unserem wöchentlichen Newsletter und vertiefen Sie Ihr Wissen mit unseren monatlichen Reviews.

Alle Beiträge anzeigen
Article page link
Kryptoindustrie
Article page link
Altcoins
Article page link
Kryptoindustrie
Smiling man with short curly hair wearing a navy blazer and white shirt against a light gray background.

Eliézer Ndinga

Globaler Leiter Forschung

Eliézer ist Global Head of Research bei 21shares. Als Gründungsmitglied des Unternehmens baute er die Forschungsabteilung von Grund auf mit auf und begleitete das Wachstum des Startups von 15 Mitarbeitern und 20 Millionen US-Dollar verwaltetem Vermögen auf über 10 Milliarden US-Dollar AUM.

Als Pionier im Bereich On-Chain-Analytik war Eliézer Mitentwickler der GCCS-Taxonomie und leitete Forschungsarbeiten, die für die historische Zulassung der ersten Bitcoin-Spot-ETFs in den USA durch die SEC entscheidend waren. Mit über einem Jahrzehnt Erfahrung in digitalen Vermögenswerten und Risikokapital, einschließlich der Seed-Finanzierung eines Fintech-Unicorns, hat er wegweisende Branchenberichte über Stablecoins verfasst, große Skandale und Wendepunkte wie FTX und das China-Verbot aufgedeckt und berät weiterhin globale Regulierungsbehörden, Institutionen und Gründer. Er wird von der RAND Corporation, der internationalen Presse und institutionellen Investoren zitiert und hält weltweit Vorträge an Institutionen über Blockchain und Finanzsysteme.

See all articles